The
recent decision in N.J. Dep’t of Children & Families, Div of Youth &
Family Servs. V. I.S. A-81-11 by the NJ Supreme Court reversed and affirmed
in part the Appellate Division’s decision in upholding the use of Title 9 for
the removal of two twins from their biological mother, I.S. The biological
mother volunteered to have her daughters placed in a residential care facility
however the court could not find a finding of neglect and abuse as required
under Title 9, N.J.S.A 9:6-8.21 necessary for the court to have jurisdiction to
remove the children.
However
under Title 30, N.J.S.A 30:4C-12, there need not be a finding of neglect and
abuse to have the children removed. The trial court erred in not dismissing the
Title 9 Complaint and instead should have relied on Title 30 for jurisdiction.
Title 30 is an acceptable alternative to Title 9 for removal proceedings when
there is no abuse or neglect. The trial court’s finding that the children
become wards of the state was reasonable and affirmed, however the expansion in
direct opposition of the plain language and Legislative intent of Title 9 was
reversed.
your post very informational.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.sethimaz.com/criminal-defense-lawyers-nyc.htm